OPINION: 8 Music Biopics That Would Probably Suck, Too

OPINION: 8 Music Biopics That Would Probably Suck, Too

So the decision is in on the extremely anticipated Queen biopic Bohemian Rhapsody: a little bit of a letdown. Not one of the vital huff surrounding the movie, which opens in theaters immediately, has something to do with Rami Malek’s good, riveting portrayal of Queen’s late, larger-than-life frontman, Freddie Mercury. And the genre-hopping British band’s wealthy musical catalog (when you may go from this to this, you just about dwell as much as the hype) is as grandiose as ever. No, the common response to Bohemian Rhapsody is that it performs it a lot too secure with Mercury’s bisexuality and his premature 1991 watershed dying from AIDS. 

Certainly, for each triumphant theatrical biopic like Tina Turner’s What’s Love Obtained to Do With It (1993), Ray Charles’ Ray (2004), Johnny Money’s Stroll the Line (2005), and N.W.A.’s Straight Outta Compton (2015), there’s the uninspiring works like Tupac Shakur drama All Eyez On Me (2017). So, honest warning to Hollywood fits searching for the subsequent artist to immortalize. Starting from the absurd to the intense, listed here are eight musical acts that may NOT translate properly in biopic kind. 

Vanilla Ice

Opposite to well-liked perception, Rob Van Winkle’s universally panned, comically terrible, early ‘90s cinematic prepare crash Cool as Ice was not a biopic. It’s, nonetheless, extra emphatic proof that rap’s final great-white-dope grifter, whose 1991 debut album To the Excessive presently stands at an unfathomable seven million copies within the U.S. alone, needs to be left within the dustbin of shameful popular culture moments, laughable operating man and all.  

Boyz II Males

Let’s be clear. Philadelphia’s native sons Boyz II Males are usually not solely the best-selling R&B group of all time, they rank amongst essentially the most commercially acclaimed music acts of the ‘90s with 60 million albums bought worldwide and 5 no. 1 Billboard Sizzling 100 singles. And it’s definitely not a matter of expertise. At their foursome peak, the “Finish of the Street” multi-platinum superstars, who immediately nonetheless ship crisp harmonies as a trio, sang most severe vocalists underneath the desk. No, the explanation Boyz II Males made our record is there’s not a lot New Version-like drama to their perpetually sedated story. 

Iggy Azalea

The unlikely fairytale of a daring, two-fisted 16-year-old Australian lady transferring to america to pursue a rap profession definitely sounds intriguing. Then you definitely understand that the plucky Aussie is Iggy Azalea, who, since garnering an preliminary HUGE co-sign from Lure Music godfather T.I. and a no. 1 hit (2014’s “Fancy”), has taken a dramatic tumble. A  and a curious cosmetic surgery debate there, today Iggy resembles the cheeky reply to a trivia query. 

Charles Hamilton

On paper, Charles Hamilton’s pioneering, cautionary story as arguably hip-hop’s first “web rapper” could be good for the large display. Within the late ’00s, the Harlem rapper made noise as the brand new age emcee that sidestepped conventional recording trade waves and dropped the self-produced, impartial 2008 assertion The Pink Lavalamp. Sadly, Hamilton grew to become identified extra for his weird conduct and embarrassingly getting punched within the face by supervisor and ex girlfriend Briana Latrise than his deeply introspective, private lyrics detailing substance abuse and psychological sickness.  

R. Kelly

The record of R. Kelly’s alleged victims grows because the self-proclaimed Pied Piper of R&B continues to face fierce protests whereas on tour. Certainly, when accusations of getting a five-year affair with one other’s man spouse and giving her an STI is the least of your worries, you realize your profession is on life help. By now, the singer-songwriter’s lengthy historical past of alleged sexual and bodily abuse and accusations of pedophilia have dwarfed his as soon as celebrated musical profession. It’s a sobering story that’s so disturbing {that a} biopic would largely trivialize R. Kelly’s monstrous conduct. 

Taylor Swift

Low-key mediocrity apart, T-Swizzle’s otherworldly cultural affect is legit. Her record-breaking Status stadium tour is now the very best grossing live performance trek by a feminine music artist, pulling in an astounding $289.2 million via the tip of the third quarter. And “Woke Taylor” has proven extra level-headed, political consciousness than Mr. Kardashian (), utilizing her mammoth reputation to weigh in on her residence state Tennessee’s senate race. However just like the aforementioned Boyz II Males, Swift’s actual life come-up is about as thrilling as watching milk spoil. 


Kiss’ resident mouthpiece Gene Simmons is well music’s most prolific A-hole, a distinction that’s fairly spectacular contemplating that the prolific record of A-holes within the recording biz is fairly huge. The clown band’s cantankerous demon, who as soon as bristled at N.W.A.’s and hip-hop’s general inclusion within the Rock and Roll Corridor of Fame and located himself apologizing for extremely offensive remarks he remodeled Prince’s tragic 2016 dying, is the most important purpose why few, outdoors the diehards, would take a Kiss flick critically. 

Future’s Baby 

How far has the beloved Beyoncé developed? The at occasions artistically-safe, Houston debutante of Future’s Baby now stands as arguably crucial expertise of her era; a power so huge that she transcends mere pop star constrictions. Which is why a Future’s Baby biopic makes little sense within the large scheme of issues. Sure, B, Kelly Rowland, Michelle Williams, and previous contributing DC members needs to be praised for respiration much-needed life into the considerably stagnant lady group style. But it surely’s laborious imagining the Knowles clan signing off on any movie detailing Future’s Baby’s behind-the-scenes juicy, backstabbing messiness.   


Leave a Reply

Notify of