Again, court refuses application to drop kidnap charges against Evans

Again, court refuses application to drop kidnap charges against Evans

Again, court refuses?application to drop kidnap charges against Evans

The Lagos State Excessive Court, sitting in Igbosere space has once more dismissed an utility searching for to quash the cost most well-liked against suspected kidnapper, Chukwudumeme Onwuamadike popularly often called Evans.  

Evans is dealing with two completely different charges earlier than the court. Within the first, he’s charged alongside three others: Joseph Emeka, Ugochukwu Nwachukwu and Victor Aduba on five-counts bordering on conspiracy to kidnap, kidnapping and tried homicide.  Evans, nevertheless, requested the court to quash the cost.  

In his utility, the defendant (Evans) had stated that ‎all of the counts within the cost had been “grossly faulty, repetitive and an abuse of court processes”.  On the resumed listening to in the present day, Justice Akintoye stated that the processes filed by each counsels to the case recognized three main points for willpower.  “Whether or not a prima facie case has been established, whether or not the charges are incompetent and whether or not the court has jurisdiction to entertain the cost,” she stated.  

Akintoye stated that for a prima facie case to be established, the proof of proof should sufficiently hyperlink the defendants with the offence. She stated “wanting carefully on the proof of proof, a prima facie case has been established. “The assertion of one of many victims acknowledged that Evans shot him with a gun, cleaned the wound by himself and requested the third defendant to take care of him (sufferer)”.  

The choose additionally held that the cost was not an abuse of court course of, including that each distinct offence must be charged individually. She, nevertheless, acknowledged that the knowledge didn’t offend the rule of duplicity as enshrined in Sections 152 and 153 of the Administration of Prison Justice Regulation (ACJL) of Lagos State. Akintoye stated that the charges weren’t faulty nor an abuse of court course of, “the cost disclosed completely different offences with completely different information, completely different victims and completely different locations”.  

She additionally stated that the defendant didn’t show that there was any miscarriage of justice within the cost filed. She stated on the problem whether or not court has jurisdiction, the argument was that the court has the facility to quash cost. She, nevertheless, held that the applying to quash cost was untimely.  

“The defendant should wait till the shut of prosecution’s case earlier than submitting to quash cost, the applying to quash cost and to discharge the defendants is hereby refused and dismissed.  “The applying lacked advantage, I so maintain,” Justice Akintoye dominated. After the ruling, the prosecutor, the Lagos State Director for Public Prosecutions (DPP), Ms Titilayo Shitta-Bey, stated in view of the ruling, the Govt desires the defendants to be arraigned. The defendants (Evans is being tried alongside Joseph Emeka, Linus Okpara and Victor Aduba) had been promptly arraigned on a 5 depend cost for allegedly conspiring amongst themselves to kidnap one Chief James Uduji, and for amassing a ransom of $1.2 million {dollars} and for makes an attempt to homicide the person.

The defendants allegedly dedicated the offences on Sept. 7, 2015, at Seventh Ave. Festac City, Lagos. The cost additionally acknowledged that the defendants whereas armed with firearms tried to kill one other Mr Donatus Nwoye by taking pictures him on his hand. It additionally acknowledged that the defendants tried to kill one Mr Jereome Okezie by taking pictures him additionally on his hand and head.  

The offences contravene Sections 230 (a) and 411 of the Prison Regulation of Lagos State, 2015. The defendants, nevertheless, all pleaded not responsible to the cost. Earlier than the ruling, the choose acknowledged that Mr Olukoya Ogungbeje, the lead counsel to Evans wrote a letter to the court withdrawing from the case. Nonetheless, one other lawyer, Mr Noel Brown introduced his look as Evans’ new counsel.  Justice Akintoye has additional ordered the remand of all of the defendants in jail and adjourned the case till Sept. 13 for trial.

http://www.lindaikejisblog.com/2018/6/again-court-refuses-application-to-drop-kidnap-charges-against-evans.html

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of
avatar

wpDiscuz